Purpose of an Organization

W. Edwards Deming described the purpose of an organization in New Economics, on page 51, as:

The aim proposed here for any organization is for everybody to gain – stockholders, employees, suppliers, customers, community, the environment – over the long term.

Like so much of what Deming said that makes sense to me. It is my sense the “conventional wisdom” would state something more along the lines of the purpose of a company is to make money. I do not agree. Rewarding the owners is important, but other stakeholders should be included in the purpose.

Even with a strictly legal argument it is not true that a company exists only to make money. The company enters into legal obligations to employees, suppliers, customers and communities.

Conventional wisdom agrees that a company must comply with the law. Many of those laws are requirements society has put in place to ensure that companies focus on obligations to their customers, community, suppliers and the environment (over the long term).

Continue reading

Posted in Deming, Management, Popular, quote, Respect, Systems thinking | Tagged , , , , | 23 Comments

Indian Firms Learning From Toyota

Taking A Page From Toyota’s Playbook [the broken link has been removed], Business Week:

The goal for Wipro is to become the Toyota of business services. Toyota preaches continuous improvement, respect for employees, learning, and embracing change. “It’s the soft stuff that makes a big impact on the hard numbers,” says Kurien, a cheerful 45-year-old. There is plenty of hard-edged analysis, as well. To embrace Toyota’s methods, Kurien last year assigned teams to examine business processes, break them into discrete components, and come up with streamlined services to sell to clients.

Wipro also adopted Toyota’s kaizen system of soliciting employee suggestions for incremental improvements, and made The Toyota Way required reading.

Continue reading

Posted in India, IT, Management, Process improvement, Respect, Toyota Production System (TPS) | 2 Comments

Science and Engineering Macroeconomic Investment

I posted to the Curious Cat Science Blog on the Science and Engineering Doctoral Degrees being granted around the world. Why do I post this here as a Economic post? I believe, as do some countries that have made significant commitments to investing in science and technology education that such investments can have a large impact on long term economic success. A couple points from that post:

From The Brain Drain [the broken link has been removed] by Debra W. Stewart, The Boston Globe

Thirty years ago the United States annually produced the vast majority of the world’s doctoral degrees. But in 1999, Europe surpassed US production of PhDs in science and engineering by more than 2,000 scholars. Asia, too, is rapidly closing its gap in doctoral production, with the governments of China, India, and Korea heavily investing in capacity at the graduate level.

Continue reading

Posted in Economics, quote, Science | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Science and Engineering Macroeconomic Investment

Design of Experiments in Advertising

How Two Guys From the Gold Country Are Changing Advertising Forever [the broken link has been removed] by Robert X. Cringely

James Kowalick and Mario Fantoni, two guys who say they can show you how to use science to design ads that cost less while being 10 or more times as effective as doing it the old way.

Their secret is the Taguchi Method, which is a technique for designing experiments that converge on an ideal product solution.

“I taught over 300 courses for industry where we designed cars and electronic devices, but it wasn’t until one day I took over my wife’s kitchen and used Taguchi to perfect my recipe for vanilla wafer cookies that I realized how broadly it could be applied,” Kowalick recalls. “It took 16 batches, but by the end of the afternoon I had those wafers dialed in.”

It is great to see the application of Designed Experiments increasing. I am reminded of an article by my father, William G. Hunter, from 1975: 101 Ways to Design an Experiment, or Some Ideas About Teaching Design of Experiments. Examples of the topics of the designed experiments his students performed:
Continue reading

Posted in Design of Experiments, Management | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

What Business Can Learn from Open Source

What Business Can Learn from Open Source by Paul Graham

As usual Paul Graham’s new article is a great read.

I think the most important of the new principles business has to learn is that people work a lot harder on stuff they like. Well, that’s news to no one. So how can I claim business has to learn it? When I say business doesn’t know this, I mean the structure of business doesn’t reflect it.

When I’m writing or hacking I spend as much time just thinking as I do actually typing. Half the time I’m sitting drinking a cup of tea, or walking around the neighborhood. This is a critical phase– this is where ideas come from– and yet I’d feel guilty doing this in most offices, with everyone else looking busy.

How many of us have heard stories of employees going to management and saying, please let us build this thing to make money for you– and the company saying no? The most famous example is probably Steve Wozniak, who originally wanted to build microcomputers for his then-employer, HP. And they turned him down. On the blunderometer, this episode ranks with IBM accepting a non-exclusive license for DOS.

On the point of the first bit of text above, W. Edwards Deming stressed the importance of Joy in Work. How many buisnesses focus on this. Very few. So often, it is easier to keep doing what has been done in the past.

Posted in IT, Management, Software Development | 5 Comments

Deming’s Seven Deadly Diseases

Topic: Management Improvement

Dr. Deming noted seven deadly diseases in chapter 3 of Out of the Crisis, 1986. Below his words from pages 97-98 are bolded. As with Deming’s other thoughts, his list of deadly diseases was continually modified as he learned more (to adjust the focus, the basic concept of the diseases were not changed). It is amazing how true all of these points still are.

Seven Deadly Diseases

  1. Lack of constancy of purpose
  2. Emphasis on short term profits (Overreaction to short term variation is harmful to long term success. With such focus on relatively unimportant short term results focus on constancy of purpose is next to impossible.)
  3. Evaluation of performance, merit rating or annual review (see: Performance Without Appraisal: What to do Instead of Performance Appraisals by Peter Scholtes).
  4. Mobility of top management (too much turnover causes numerous problems)
  5. Managing by use of visible figures, with little of no consideration of figures that are unknown or unknowable. Many important factors are “unknown and unknowable.” This is an obvious statement that runs counter to what some incorrectly claim Deming taught – that you can only manage what you measure. Deming did not believe this and if fact saw it as a deadly disease of management
  6. Excessive medical costs
  7. Excessive costs of liability, swelled by lawyers that work on contingency fees.

I posted earlier this year on this topic:USA Health Care Costs reaching 15.3% of GDP – the highest percentage ever. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services release focused on it a different way saying: “HEALTH CARE SPENDING IN THE UNITED STATES SLOWS FOR THE FIRST TIME IN SEVEN YEARS” (I am repeating their use of ALL CAPS). Of all the deadly diseases, excessive medical costs seems to be doing the most critical damage to the country and I see little hope that it won’t keep getting worse.

Thankfully, it does seem more people understand some of the problems of focusing on short term profits; but the disease is still rampant. And we can take hope that more people are willing to say that performance evaluations are causing significant problems (Abolishing Performance Appraisals is a good book for those battling this disease). Yet while some organization have eliminated them, most still go through the motions of this annual ritual, that it seems to me few believe in.

While we are making some progress we have quite a bit of work to make significant progress against these deadly diseases. Thankfully the improvement in management over the last two decades has been significant, though nowhere near enough. We have strengthened our ability to cope with the effects of the deadly diseases. Building on those successes, and the steps being made against some deadly diseases, it would be nice to see more progress to directly address the deadly diseases themselves in the future.

Posted in Deming, Economics, Management | 2 Comments

Six Sigma at Jaguar

Six Sigma at Jaguar interview with David Brunson, Powertrain Quality & Reliability, Jaguar Cars Limited by onesixsigma.com.

Are there particular tools you want to focus on using more in the future?

Yes, it’s very important to focus on the tools you are getting the most value from, and try to apply them to as many areas as possible. There are tools that we want to be using more in the future:

  • Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility (R&R)
  • Modeling using design of experiments (DOE), including design selection & Analysis
  • Design FMEA with robustness linkages

It is very dangerous to think of six sigma as a set of tools, as if a company does not understand their processes properly, then they can not expect six sigma to save them money through the application of tools.

Definition of what is going on at each stage of the process is much more important than the tools being used.

Find more Six Sigma articles from the Curious Cat Management Improvement library.

Posted in Management | Comments Off on Six Sigma at Jaguar

Curious Cat Travels: Olympic and Mt. St. Helens

Topic: Travel

I have posted pictures from my recent trip to the Pacific Northwest: Olympic National Park photos and Mount Saint Helens National Volcanic Monument photos.


Previous travelogues include: Rocky Mountain National Park, Yellowstone National Park, Paris and Egypt.
Posted in Management | Comments Off on Curious Cat Travels: Olympic and Mt. St. Helens

Bezos on Lean Thinking

Topic: Management Improvement and Investing

10 Questions for Jeff Bezos, time.com via Lean Manufacturing Blog

Time: Here’s a question you probably hear all the time: read any good books lately?
Bezos: [Laughs.] I read a book recently about Toyota’s lean production methodology, which is very interesting

Jeff Bezos is the founder and CEO of Amazon.com. He really understand many quality management ideas: customer focus, long term thinking, process improvement, innovation. He also understands finance much better than most. I believe that knowledge is a large part of the reason he is not intimidated into going along with the short term thinking prevalent on Wall Street (as so many CEO’s are). His huge ownership interest in Amazon and his decision to raise large amounts of cash for Amazon (by issuing bonds) during the tech boom, don’t hurt either.

Amazon was one of the 10 companies selected in the 10 stocks for 10 years post. I created a Marketocracy portfolio to track that long term portfolio. The rules, at the time (for a Marketocracy portfolio), required more diversification so I added several stocks to the portfolio. I added positions in YHOO, MSFT, EMF, WMT, and BP. You can track the results of the Sleep Well portfolio.

You can also view results of another portfolio I have managed, through marketocracy, for several years: the Darvamore Fund. This fund is much more aggressive using the ideas of Darvas and Livermore as well as core positions that are selected for long term appreciation. Since the inception, in 2000, it has a annual rate of return 6.55% (655 basis points) higher than the S&P 500 index, as of today.

Posted in Investing, Lean thinking, Management | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Peter F. Drucker Award for Nonprofit Innovation

Topic: Management Improvement

Peter F. Drucker Award for Nonprofit Innovation:

““The purpose of the Peter F. Drucker Award for Nonprofit Innovation is to find the innovators, whether small or large, to recognize and celebrate their example, and to inspire others.””
Peter F. Drucker

In the years ahead, America’s nonprofits will become even more important. As government retrenches, Americans will look increasingly to the nonprofits to tackle the problems of a fast-changing society. These challenges will demand innovation — in services, and in nonprofit management. The purpose of the annual Peter F. Drucker Award for Nonprofit Innovation is to find the innovators, whether small or large; to recognize and celebrate their example; and, to inspire others.

Applications must be complete and received by the Drucker School no later than August 12, 2005. Read the details on eligibility and how to apply

Posted in Management | Comments Off on Peter F. Drucker Award for Nonprofit Innovation