I ran across a specific example of standard policy that I found amusing (related to the post earlier today on Why Isn’t Work Standard). Like the authors, I can’t really see a reason for why you would want a policy that no more than two prepaid cell phones can be purchased. But if it is important, couldn’t you design a much better system to assure this policy was followed. And, at the very least, let customers hear your reasoning (so make an accurate explanation part of the standard work instruction stopping the sale of more than 2) behind such a restraint on their options. Doing so wouldn’t really help solve the problem (if they want more phones) but it seems it would be better customer service not to make up stuff like claiming it is the law – which is what happens when you tell people to do things without explaining why. Why Wal-Mart Will Refuse to Sell You Prepaid Cell Phones:
Later, the post author explains the answer he receives after calling Walmart headquarters and being directed to the District manager – “the only person that could quote policy.” The person that answers says the district manager is busy but she can answer, there is no policy that only the district manager can quote policy:
Verizon seems to be doing a good job keeping poor customer focus as a guiding policy (double trouble at Verizon):
Me: “Why not?”
Verizon Associate: “I’m not really sure. But that’s our policy.”
Me: “So, I can buy an un-activated Verizon prepaid phone in Wal-Mart, but I can’t buy one un-activated from Verizon?”
Verizon Associate: “That’s correct.”
Related: Telephone Savings – Incredibly Bad Customer Service from Discover Card – Poor Service – Industry Standard? – Companies in Need of Customer Focus
More customer focus goodness from the post, Target this time:
By the way I bet while in the short run Wal-Mart caused the customer a great deal of trouble in the long run the customer is much better off due to all the publicity they get from people like me pointing to their post.
Pingback: CuriousCat: iPhone + AT&T = Yikes