Open Source Management Terms

Posted on May 23, 2005  Comments (4)

Statistical Method Helps Boost Bottom Lines, Batting Averages by Jon Van, Chicago Tribune:

Using statistical techniques embraced by quality guru W. Edwards Deming, Holland has worked for a generation guiding enterprises large and small to boost efficiency.

Yet getting management support for an MVT project is vital, Holland said, because experience shows that only 25 percent of ideas intended to improve a process will have a positive effect. The others will either have no effect or will hurt. Managers hate to see experimental results shoot down ideas they were certain would help, he said.

The article also mentions:

While Holland claims MVT as his own, others say it is really just a variation of strategies widely used in business.

“Multifactor experiments have been around for a long time,” said Ajit Tamhane, Northwestern University professor of statistics and industrial engineering and management sciences.

David Coit, a Rutgers University professor of industrial systems engineering, said that Holland’s MVT is very much like a quality-enhancing scheme called design of experiments.

So often we seem to focus on proprietary solutions. Instead it seems to me, most often what is needed is to do a good job of applying the ideas that have been known for decades. Deming ideas, design of experiments, lean thinking, experimentation, etc. are not secrets. There is a long history of how to apply these ideas to improve organizational performance.

QualPro obviously does well marketing itself (see press clippings from their web site) selling the concept of proprietary solutions to press organizations. Raising the question of whether the proprietary solutions really offers unique ideas, as the The Tribune article did was uncommon in my experience.

I like those encouraging the adoption of statistical tools to improvement management but I find the practice of trademarking terms like Six Sigma and MVT a bad way to encourage innovation in the practice of management. While it is nice to see Six Sigma efforts and others use statistical tools (such as design of experiments) I would encourage people to stay with “open source” management terms and remain part of a community looking to improve the practice of management.

Update: Also see – Management Advice Failures

4 Responses to “Open Source Management Terms”

  1. Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog » Six Sigma in Software Development
    August 13th, 2007 @ 9:10 am

    [...] six sigma does seem to foster a lack of sharing which is a shame. [...]

  2. Curious Cat Management Blog » Checklists Save Lives
    January 17th, 2009 @ 10:01 am

    Checklists are a simple quality tool that have been used widely for decades…

  3. Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog » Supporting Free and Open Source Software
    January 24th, 2011 @ 9:42 am

    I get so much from great open source software like Ruby, Rails, Ubuntu, Apache, MySQL along with lots of less well known software, that it is important to me to contribute to sustaining the environment that will continue to produce such great software…

  4. Problems with Management and Business Books » Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog
    April 18th, 2011 @ 8:05 am

    [...] fail to place their book (or their trademarked strategy they hope turns into a movement/fad) in the appropriate context. Most books just take a few good [...]

Leave a Reply





  • Recent Trackbacks

  • Comments