Cost Cutting is Much Different than Waste Removal
Posted on December 30, 2008 Comments (1)
Cost Cutting is Much Different than Waste Removal by Jim Womack
This last expedient is the one I most fear, because it is likely to be justified in the name of “lean.” Every recession seems to produce a major cost-cutting campaign sold by traditional consultants. Their key promise is rapid financial payback, even within one quarter, and the only practical way to achieve this is layoffs. I truly hope that the recession of 2009 will not be known to history as the “lean” recession and everyone in the Lean Community should vow to avoid the cost-cutting urge in their own organization.
To avoid the need for cost cutting, I hope that every would-be lean enterprise will assign someone responsibility for developing a “recession A3″ that carefully reviews the background situation. The critical step in the A3 process will then be to develop a set of countermeasures that can protect the organization and its people through the current recession while laying the ground work for a sustainable lean enterprise in the future.
Related: Operational Excellence – Going lean Brings Long-term Payoffs – Bad Management Results in Layoffs – Cutting Hours Instead of People
One Response to “Cost Cutting is Much Different than Waste Removal”
Leave a Reply



RSS Feed
January 1st, 2009 @ 8:29 pm
Getting lean for you does mean cost cutting. It does mean re-examining everything you do and deciding not to do some things anymore…