<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Combinatorial Testing for Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2009/03/26/combinatorial-testing-for-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2009/03/26/combinatorial-testing-for-software/</link>
	<description>Management Improvement focused on Deming, lean thinking, innovation, customer focus, six sigma, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog » Mistake Proofing Deployment of Software Code</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2009/03/26/combinatorial-testing-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-36361</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog » Mistake Proofing Deployment of Software Code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1211#comment-36361</guid>
		<description>Mistake-proofing a process both improves it (many poka-yoke solutions make the process easier to use) and prevents an error in case you still try something wrong. So I see the automated tests as a way to serve as a backstop, in case the process improvement you made to the software development process failed in some form...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mistake-proofing a process both improves it (many poka-yoke solutions make the process easier to use) and prevents an error in case you still try something wrong. So I see the automated tests as a way to serve as a backstop, in case the process improvement you made to the software development process failed in some form&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog » Combinatorial Testing – The Quadrant of Massive Efficiency Gains</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2009/03/26/combinatorial-testing-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-35356</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog » Combinatorial Testing – The Quadrant of Massive Efficiency Gains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1211#comment-35356</guid>
		<description>When you have a situation that has many many many possible parameters and each time only a few possible choices (a few items you are trying to vary and test – in his example in the video, 2 choices) you wind up with a ridicules number of possible tests if you try to vary one variable at a time. But you can cover all the possibilities in just 30 tests if your coverage target is all possible pairs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you have a situation that has many many many possible parameters and each time only a few possible choices (a few items you are trying to vary and test – in his example in the video, 2 choices) you wind up with a ridicules number of possible tests if you try to vary one variable at a time. But you can cover all the possibilities in just 30 tests if your coverage target is all possible pairs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Blog » Improving Software Development with Automated Tests</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2009/03/26/combinatorial-testing-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-34994</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Blog » Improving Software Development with Automated Tests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1211#comment-34994</guid>
		<description>if a software developer changes the code, the automated tests are all run and if there is an error noted by the automated testing the code cannot be deployed to the production environment... Thus automated testing mistake proofs the process</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if a software developer changes the code, the automated tests are all run and if there is an error noted by the automated testing the code cannot be deployed to the production environment&#8230; Thus automated testing mistake proofs the process</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2009/03/26/combinatorial-testing-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-34291</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1211#comment-34291</guid>
		<description>I appreciate that you are helping spread the word about Combinatorial Testing software. I really wish this field was expanded on by the experts! 
Thanks again </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate that you are helping spread the word about Combinatorial Testing software. I really wish this field was expanded on by the experts!</p>
<p>Thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Blog: Baking in Quality to Software Development</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2009/03/26/combinatorial-testing-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-34111</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Blog: Baking in Quality to Software Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1211#comment-34111</guid>
		<description>One of the reasons my organizations switched to Ruby on Rails for software development was the great integration with automated testing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the reasons my organizations switched to Ruby on Rails for software development was the great integration with automated testing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Blog: Three Years of Real-World IT Projects In Ruby</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2009/03/26/combinatorial-testing-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-34110</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Blog: Three Years of Real-World IT Projects In Ruby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1211#comment-34110</guid>
		<description>The talk provides a good background on their experience using ruby to manage projects; and how they manage ruby application development projects...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The talk provides a good background on their experience using ruby to manage projects; and how they manage ruby application development projects&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2009/03/26/combinatorial-testing-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-34089</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 05:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1211#comment-34089</guid>
		<description>And also, please check out Hexawise, the new test design tool I have developed that uses these Design of Experiments principles to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.  Proof of concept pilot projects we are currently conducting at multiple companies are showing the following results: (1) Reduction in time it takes to identify and document test cases of 30-40%, (2) Reduction in test execution times of approximately 25-35% (because fewer, more effective test cases are run), and (3) Reduction in cost to fix defects (because more defects are found sooner with the more effective test cases).

Free trials (and a free version) are available at: http://hexawise.com/users/new

Thank you.

- Justin
Founder and CEO of Hexawise
http:www.hexawise.com
&quot;More coverage.  Fewer tests.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And also, please check out Hexawise, the new test design tool I have developed that uses these Design of Experiments principles to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.  Proof of concept pilot projects we are currently conducting at multiple companies are showing the following results: (1) Reduction in time it takes to identify and document test cases of 30-40%, (2) Reduction in test execution times of approximately 25-35% (because fewer, more effective test cases are run), and (3) Reduction in cost to fix defects (because more defects are found sooner with the more effective test cases).</p>
<p>Free trials (and a free version) are available at: <a href="http://hexawise.com/users/new" >http://hexawise.com/users/new</a></p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>- Justin<br />
Founder and CEO of Hexawise<br />
http:www.hexawise.com<br />
&#8220;More coverage.  Fewer tests.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2009/03/26/combinatorial-testing-for-software/comment-page-1/#comment-33757</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1211#comment-33757</guid>
		<description>John,

Thanks for getting the word out about the efficiency and quality benefits available through pairwise software testing and other forms of combinatorial software testing.  It is surprising to me that the benefits are not more broadly known by testing community, given how fast, easy, and unambiguous it is to measure the benefits. 

For any of your readers interested in finding out more about combinatorial testing, I would recommend a couple clear and concise articles posted at:


http://www.combinatorialtesting.com/clear-introductions-1

and the pairwise testing instructional videos posted at:

http://www.combinatorialtesting.com/videos

- Justin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Thanks for getting the word out about the efficiency and quality benefits available through pairwise software testing and other forms of combinatorial software testing.  It is surprising to me that the benefits are not more broadly known by testing community, given how fast, easy, and unambiguous it is to measure the benefits. </p>
<p>For any of your readers interested in finding out more about combinatorial testing, I would recommend a couple clear and concise articles posted at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.combinatorialtesting.com/clear-introductions-1" >http://www.combinatorialtesting.com/clear-introductions-1</a></p>
<p>and the pairwise testing instructional videos posted at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.combinatorialtesting.com/videos" >http://www.combinatorialtesting.com/videos</a></p>
<p>- Justin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

