<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motivation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/</link>
	<description>Management Improvement focused on Deming, lean thinking, innovation, customer focus, six sigma, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuriousCat: Enhancing Passion of Employees</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/comment-page-1/#comment-29584</link>
		<dc:creator>CuriousCat: Enhancing Passion of Employees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/#comment-29584</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dilbert makes fun of quite of a few of the stupid management practices that sap passion from people.  What you need to do is eliminate de-motivation, not to try to enhance passion directly.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dilbert makes fun of quite of a few of the stupid management practices that sap passion from people.  What you need to do is eliminate de-motivation, not to try to enhance passion directly.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Motivating People to Change</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/comment-page-1/#comment-4491</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Motivating People to Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 18:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/#comment-4491</guid>
		<description>[...] Stop Demotivating Employees - theory x motivation - Incentive Programs are Ineffective - Motivational Posters - theory x or theory y management - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stop Demotivating Employees &#8211; theory x motivation &#8211; Incentive Programs are Ineffective &#8211; Motivational Posters &#8211; theory x or theory y management &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eliminate Slogans</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eliminate Slogans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 18:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>[...] This poster may do a better job than my posts showing why posters and slogan are not an effective management strategy (Dilbert and Deming - ). Despair (link to the motivation poster shown here), offers many such de-motivational posters and note cards - well done satire in my opinion but they might be too much for some. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This poster may do a better job than my posts showing why posters and slogan are not an effective management strategy (Dilbert and Deming &#8211; ). Despair (link to the motivation poster shown here), offers many such de-motivational posters and note cards &#8211; well done satire in my opinion but they might be too much for some. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dangers of Extrinsic Motivation</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dangers of Extrinsic Motivation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Joel notes relying on extrinsic motivation to drive performance is an abdication of management...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel notes relying on extrinsic motivation to drive performance is an abdication of management&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: projekt</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>projekt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/21/motivation/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Employee ownership can be a really great way to encourage employees. Certainly, partnerships are often much happier than corporations. There are caveats, though, to ESOPs.

Most ESOPs never will give employees enough of a share to feel like stakeholders. Consider: your salary is $30,000. You own 5000 shares of stock at $20, which would be a lot for someone at this paygrade to have accumulated. Would you prefer a 3% raise or a $0.25/share dividend/quarter?   Obviously, you&#039;d prefer the raise. But the non-employee stockholders want the dividend. There&#039;s only so much money to go around.

On the other hand, the executives are probably being given tons of stock, in addition to lavish pay. Your piddly 5000 shares will never have any voice compared to their 500,000 or 1,000,000 shares. They are unlikely to give you and your fellow workers that kind of voting power either.

The situation is even more cynical when it&#039;s employee stock options plans. There, the vesting period is usually unreasonable, like 5 years. Companies grant options for like 1000 shares to line employees, and then think that this will motivate them to &quot;work hard&quot; and build the company for five years. Most employees write these things off like they&#039;re as fake as they are. As employees were leaving one sinking ship I observed, the managers were like, &quot;What about your options!&quot; The employees were incredulous that the managers actually believed the options would ever be in the money. 

The only way to truly motivate employees with ownership is to give them enough voting power that a reasonable-size bloc could seriously affect the direction of the company, such as in the selection of executives and their pay, and in the financial decisions. I don&#039;t think many companies are willing to go this far!

In my opinion, it&#039;s much easier to just hire people for jobs they want to do, and not sap their intrinsic motivation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employee ownership can be a really great way to encourage employees. Certainly, partnerships are often much happier than corporations. There are caveats, though, to ESOPs.</p>
<p>Most ESOPs never will give employees enough of a share to feel like stakeholders. Consider: your salary is $30,000. You own 5000 shares of stock at $20, which would be a lot for someone at this paygrade to have accumulated. Would you prefer a 3% raise or a $0.25/share dividend/quarter?   Obviously, you&#8217;d prefer the raise. But the non-employee stockholders want the dividend. There&#8217;s only so much money to go around.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the executives are probably being given tons of stock, in addition to lavish pay. Your piddly 5000 shares will never have any voice compared to their 500,000 or 1,000,000 shares. They are unlikely to give you and your fellow workers that kind of voting power either.</p>
<p>The situation is even more cynical when it&#8217;s employee stock options plans. There, the vesting period is usually unreasonable, like 5 years. Companies grant options for like 1000 shares to line employees, and then think that this will motivate them to &#8220;work hard&#8221; and build the company for five years. Most employees write these things off like they&#8217;re as fake as they are. As employees were leaving one sinking ship I observed, the managers were like, &#8220;What about your options!&#8221; The employees were incredulous that the managers actually believed the options would ever be in the money. </p>
<p>The only way to truly motivate employees with ownership is to give them enough voting power that a reasonable-size bloc could seriously affect the direction of the company, such as in the selection of executives and their pay, and in the financial decisions. I don&#8217;t think many companies are willing to go this far!</p>
<p>In my opinion, it&#8217;s much easier to just hire people for jobs they want to do, and not sap their intrinsic motivation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

