<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zero Defects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/22/zero-defects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/22/zero-defects/</link>
	<description>Management Improvement focused on Deming, lean thinking, innovation, customer focus, six sigma, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Giddings</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/22/zero-defects/comment-page-1/#comment-42823</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Giddings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/?p=409#comment-42823</guid>
		<description>Dave Crosby - I tend to agree with you.  John Hunter - I tend to agree with you too.  Is that logically possible?  I believe it is.  I&#039;m a disciple of TQM.  Yet, I&#039;ve seen what I call zero-defect phonies.  They make me glorious claims that include, among other mechanisms, creative redefining of the word &#039;defect&#039;.  I like your points about a culture of continuous improvement John.  But Dave&#039;s point is very well-said, also.  Would love to round-table with you guys sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Crosby &#8211; I tend to agree with you.  John Hunter &#8211; I tend to agree with you too.  Is that logically possible?  I believe it is.  I&#8217;m a disciple of TQM.  Yet, I&#8217;ve seen what I call zero-defect phonies.  They make me glorious claims that include, among other mechanisms, creative redefining of the word &#8216;defect&#8217;.  I like your points about a culture of continuous improvement John.  But Dave&#8217;s point is very well-said, also.  Would love to round-table with you guys sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Crosby</title>
		<link>http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2006/01/22/zero-defects/comment-page-1/#comment-36219</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://management.curiouscatblog.net/?p=409#comment-36219</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re over-thinking zero defects. In my view it doesn&#039;t prevent or slow down innovation; it&#039;s simply the idea of doing work right. There is always a left and a right to every subject, zero defects belongs right in the middle; it&#039;s just not that complicated. As the title of my book &quot;The Zero Defects Option&quot; suggests, zero defects is the leaders option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re over-thinking zero defects. In my view it doesn&#8217;t prevent or slow down innovation; it&#8217;s simply the idea of doing work right. There is always a left and a right to every subject, zero defects belongs right in the middle; it&#8217;s just not that complicated. As the title of my book &#8220;The Zero Defects Option&#8221; suggests, zero defects is the leaders option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

